Risks
Inherent. Residual.
Entity-scoped.
A compliance risk register for regulated firms: a pre-built risk taxonomy mapped to your obligations, inherent and residual scoring against your risk appetite, and a heatmap the committee will open.
Risks, in the platform
Residual Risks by Appetite Band
Risk counts grouped by residual appetite band, across top-level (L1) risks.
Top 10 Residual Risks
L1 risks ranked by residual score (highest first).
| # | Risk | Category | Residual | Obligations | Controls | Open actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Financial Crime Governance | Financial Crime | 12/16 | 161 | 3 | 1 |
| 2 | Resilience | Governance, Risk and Compliance | 12/16 | 30 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | Customer Due Diligence | Financial Crime | 12/16 | 716 | 5 | 1 |
| 4 | Sanctions | Financial Crime | 9/16 | 19 | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | Audit & Accounts | Governance, Risk and Compliance | 9/16 | 171 | 1 | 3 |
| 6 | Outsourcing | Governance, Risk and Compliance | 8/16 | 277 | 2 | 1 |
| 7 | Client Assets | Conduct of Business | 8/16 | 142 | 3 | 0 |
| 8 | Conflicts of Interest | Conduct of Business | 8/16 | 58 | 2 | 1 |
| 9 | Data Protection | Governance, Risk and Compliance | 6/16 | 96 | 2 | 0 |
| 10 | Business Continuity | Prudential | 6/16 | 41 | 1 | 1 |
Inherent vs Residual by Appetite Band
L1 risk counts by appetite band — inherent vs residual.
| Band | Inherent | Residual |
|---|---|---|
| Accepted | 9 | 24 |
| Within | 20 | 21 |
| Approaching | 17 | 9 |
| Outside | 11 | 3 |
Upcoming Reviews / Risk Alerts
Scheduled review dates, soonest first.
| Risk | Level | Next review |
|---|---|---|
| Sanctions | L1 | in 3 days |
| Screening Vendor Outage | L2 | in 6 days |
| Customer Due Diligence | L1 | in 13 days |
| Resilience | L1 | in 27 days |
Worst Risk Score by Category
| Category | Inherent | Residual |
|---|---|---|
| Governance, Risk and Compliance | 16/16 | 12/16 |
| Financial Crime | 16/16 | 12/16 |
| Conduct of Business | 12/16 | 8/16 |
| Prudential | 9/16 | 6/16 |
| Title | Level | Inherent Risk | Residual Risk | Deduction Factor | Controls | Actions | Owner(s) | Status | Last Reviewed | Next Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audit & Accounts | L1 | 12/16 | 9/16 | 25% | 4 | 3 | Active | 02/06/2026 | 02/12/2026 | |
| Business Continuity | L1 | 8/16 | 6/16 | 25% | 2 | 1 | Active | 14/05/2026 | 14/11/2026 | |
| Client Assets | L1 | 16/16 | 8/16 | 50% | 3 | 0 | Active | 21/07/2026 | 21/01/2027 | |
| Complaints | L1 | 8/16 | 2/16 | 75% | 2 | 1 | Active | 09/06/2026 | 09/12/2026 | |
| Compliance Function | L1 | 6/16 | 3/16 | 50% | 1 | 1 | Active | 30/06/2026 | 30/12/2026 | |
| Conflicts of Interest | L1 | 16/16 | 8/16 | 50% | 2 | 1 | Active | 11/05/2026 | 11/11/2026 | |
| Customer Due Diligence | L1 | 16/16 | 12/16 | 25% | 5 | 1 | Active | 05/08/2026 | 29/08/2026 | |
| Data Protection | L1 | 12/16 | 6/16 | 50% | 2 | 0 | Active | 18/03/2026 | 18/09/2026 | |
| Financial Crime Governance | L1 | 16/16 | 12/16 | 25% | 3 | 1 | Active | 05/08/2026 | 05/02/2027 | |
| Financial Crime Monitoring | L1 | 12/16 | 3/16 | 75% | 3 | 1 | Active | 19/06/2026 | 19/12/2026 | |
| Financial Promotions | L1 | 8/16 | 4/16 | 50% | 1 | 1 | Active | 22/04/2026 | 22/10/2026 | |
| Outsourcing | L1 | 16/16 | 8/16 | 50% | 2 | 1 | Active | 02/07/2026 | 02/01/2027 |
Ratings
Likelihood Scores
Ratings should be assigned based on the overall description that best fits the: i) nature of the compliance obligations; and ii) the firm’s level of exposure to the Compliance Risk through its business model or organisational structure.
Compliance obligations
Exposure
Impact Scores
A rating should be assigned to each Level 1 Compliance Risk. Ratings should be based on the plausible worst case consequences of breaching the Compliance Risk and should reflect the highest potential impact in any single area.
Reputation
Stakeholder
Regulator
Risks, in the function you actually run.
Vantage Point starts you with a risk taxonomy, not a blank register: the Level 1 compliance risks a regulated firm carries (customer due diligence, financial crime governance, client assets, outsourcing, resilience and the rest), each broken into Level 2 risks and mapped to the obligations that drive them. Every entity in your book gets its own copy, so a fund and its administrator are assessed on their own facts.
Scoring is one method, applied the same way every time. Likelihood is rated on the nature of the compliance obligations and the firm’s exposure through its business model; impact on the plausible worst case for reputation, stakeholders and the regulator, each on a four-point scale. The greatest likelihood times the greatest impact is the inherent score, out of sixteen. Parent risks aggregate from their children, so the L1 picture is always the sum of what sits beneath it.
Controls do the rest. Each control’s design and performance rating, blended with the strength of the wider control framework, sets a deduction factor for the risk. Residual risk is inherent less that deduction, and because the inputs are on the record, so is the arithmetic. Residual is then read against the entity’s appetite bands, Accepted through Outside, set per entity, so a breach of appetite means the same thing on every board paper.
From there the risk is a working record: its controls, obligations, tests and open actions on one page, a review date the dashboard tracks, and an escalation raised when residual passes its threshold. The heatmap, the top ten by residual and the appetite ladder are the same numbers, one click away.
- Inherent is likelihood times impact on the 4×4. Residual is inherent less the deduction your controls earn.
- Read against the entity's own appetite bands, never a house average.
- A heatmap your committee will actually open.
The rest of the system.
- Actions Corrective. Monitoring. Escalation. One workflow.
- CMP Doing it right.
- Controls Mapped to what they satisfy.
- Registers Pre-built registers. Configurable fields.
- Regulatory library Pre-built. Kept current.
- Reports Live data. Committee-ready.
- Entities One system. Yours and your clients'.
- Audit trail Audit by design.
Questions about risks.
- How are risks scored?
- Inherent risk is likelihood times impact on a 4 by 4 grid, giving a score from 1 to 16. Residual risk is the inherent score less the deduction your controls earn, shown to one decimal place. Both are read against the entity's own appetite bands, never a house average.
- What are the appetite bands?
- Accepted, Within, Approaching and Outside. Each entity sets its own thresholds, so a residual score of 9 can be Within appetite for one entity and Approaching for another, and the heatmap and reports colour it accordingly.
- Is there a pre-built risk taxonomy?
- Yes. A pre-built taxonomy of L1 and L2 compliance risks is mapped to the obligations in the library, so a new entity has a populated risk register on day one. You can add, rename and retire risks to match how your committee thinks about the business.
- How do controls affect residual risk?
- Each control carries a design rating and an operating-effectiveness rating (Weak, Developing, Established, Strong). The lower of the two drives the deduction, so a well-designed control that is not operating does not flatter the residual figure.
- Can each client entity have its own risk assessment?
- Yes. Risk assessments are entity-scoped: your own firm and every managed client entity each carry their own register, appetite bands and heatmap, with a consolidated view for group governance and per-entity views for client boards.
Risks, further in.
See risks running on your firm's structure.
A 30-minute walkthrough using your entities, your licences and a real workflow you bring to the call. No slide deck.